The India Power Atlas
Part III · Society and Organisation
Chapter 9

Public Opinion on Contested Questions

Arena 2.2 · weight 3 · reading 50.7 · contested

9.1Scope

What people believe on the core questions.1

The arena is measured by 16 representative survey items on policy (UCC, CAA, Art. 370, conversion laws, security …) and identity (Hindu India, majority will …), weighted by sample and recency, plus salience.

9.2Significance

What a party can say and do without losing votes; public acceptance of laws; a slow-moving layer of power.

9.3Indicators and weights

Table 9.1 lists the 3 indicators of the arena, the weight of each within the arena, and each indicator’s reading (the Hindutva-aligned share, from 0 to 100).

Table 9.1. Indicators of arena 2.2

IndicatorWeightReading
Policy positions (9 all-adult items, sample- and recency-weighted)20.4059.8
Identity positions (7 items)30.4039.3
Intensity and salience40.2055.5
Arena reading1.0050.7

9.4Reading

The arena reads 50.7, 0.7 points above parity, and is classified as contested (a reading from 45 to below 60). With a weight of 3 of a total 107.7, it contributes 1.41 points to the composite reading of 45.7.

The indicators diverge: the highest reading is for policy positions (9 all-adult items, sample- and recency-weighted) (59.8), the lowest for identity positions (7 items) (39.3).

Figure 9.1. Readings of arena 2.2 by indicator
050100
Policy positions (9 all-adult items, sample- and recency-weighted)59.8
Identity positions (7 items)39.3
Intensity and salience55.5
Arena reading50.7
Hindutva-alignedOpposed

Each bar divides the indicator between Hindutva-aligned (left) and opposed (right) holdings. The vertical rule marks parity.

9.5Measures and exhibits

The exhibits below are the Atlas’s own views of the data behind each measure: shares by side, the largest units, breakdowns by source, recipient and country, money-flow diagrams and time series. Full row-level ledgers are in the data file (Appendix D).

Measure 1. Policy positions (9 all-adult items, sample- and recency-weighted)

Reading 59.8%

UCC, CAA, NRC, Art. 370, love-jihad laws, Op Sindoor, caste census, same-sex marriage, hijab; n recorded for all 9 items; UCC, NRC and love-jihad are support-only (no oppose figure published) (beliefs_units.csv)

Figure 9.2. Each counted row (% Hindutva share of decided)Rates and shares are not added up: each row is its own reading.
Uniform Civil Code | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Aug 202675
Operation Sindoor / strong security | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Aug 202572.4
Hijab ban in schools | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Jan 202368.7
CAA | India Today-Karvy MOTN | Jan 202061.2
Article 370 abrogation | Lokniti-CSDS pre-poll | Apr 202458.6
Anti-conversion / "love jihad" laws | India Today-Karvy MOTN | Jan 202158
NRC | India Today-Karvy MOTN | Jan 202049
Same-sex marriage | Pew Global Attitudes (Spring 2023) | Feb-May 202344.8
Caste census | DALES Indian Election Study 2024 | Apr-Jun 202423.5
0100%
Hindutva-alignedOpposed
Data table
% Hindutva share of decidedSide
Uniform Civil Code | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Aug 202675Hindutva-aligned
Operation Sindoor / strong security | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Aug 202572.4Hindutva-aligned
Hijab ban in schools | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Jan 202368.7Hindutva-aligned
CAA | India Today-Karvy MOTN | Jan 202061.2Hindutva-aligned
Article 370 abrogation | Lokniti-CSDS pre-poll | Apr 202458.6Hindutva-aligned
Anti-conversion / "love jihad" laws | India Today-Karvy MOTN | Jan 202158Hindutva-aligned
NRC | India Today-Karvy MOTN | Jan 202049Opposed
Same-sex marriage | Pew Global Attitudes (Spring 2023) | Feb-May 202344.8Opposed
Caste census | DALES Indian Election Study 2024 | Apr-Jun 202423.5Opposed
Figure 9.3. Over time: UCC support, CAA support · % support
02040608020192020202120222023202420252026UCC support (India Today MOTN) 2021: 70% supportUCC support (India Today MOTN) 2023: 69% supportUCC support (India Today MOTN) 2025: 65.1% supportUCC support (India Today MOTN) 2026: 73.9% supportCAA support 2019: 62.1% support73.962.1
UCC support (India Today MOTN)CAA support
Data table
UCC support (India Today MOTN)CAA support
201962.1
202170
202369
202565.1
202673.9
Figure 9.4. Over time: CAA support · % "helps persecuted minorities"
0204020202021CAA support 2020: 41% "helps persecuted minorities"41
Data table
CAA support
202041
Figure 9.5. Over time: CAA support · % approve
020406020212022CAA support 2021: 53% approve53
Data table
CAA support
202153
Figure 9.6. Over time: NRC support · % implement nationwide
020406020192020NRC support 2019: 65.4% implement nationwide65.4
Data table
NRC support
201965.4
Figure 9.7. Over time: NRC support · % "good step"
0204020202021NRC support 2020: 49% "good step"49
Data table
NRC support
202049
Figure 9.8. Over time: Art 370 (should be revoked/repealed) · % should be revoked
020406020192020Art 370: should be revoked/repealed 2019: 57% should be revoked57
Data table
Art 370: should be revoked/repealed
201957
Figure 9.9. Over time: Art 370 (should be revoked/repealed) · % should have been repealed
01020304020242025Art 370: should be revoked/repealed 2024: 34% should have been repealed34
Data table
Art 370: should be revoked/repealed
202434
Figure 9.10. Over time: Art 370 (want it reinstated) · % want Art 370 reinstated
01020304020232024Art 370: want it reinstated 2023: 31.2% want Art 370 reinstated31.2
Data table
Art 370: want it reinstated
202331.2
Figure 9.11. Over time: Caste census support · % in favour
020406020242025Caste census support (MOTN; Hindutva coded oppose) 2024: 59% in favourCaste census support (MOTN; Hindutva coded oppose) 2025: 69% in favour69
Data table
Caste census support (MOTN; Hindutva coded oppose)
202459
202569
Figure 9.12. Over time: Same-sex marriage support/acceptance · % accepted
010203020192020Same-sex marriage support/acceptance 2019: 24% accepted24
Data table
Same-sex marriage support/acceptance
201924
Figure 9.13. Over time: Same-sex marriage support/acceptance · % favour legal SSM
020406020232024Same-sex marriage support/acceptance 2023: 53% favour legal SSM53
Data table
Same-sex marriage support/acceptance
202353
Figure 9.14. Over time: Homosexuality never justifiable · % never justifiable
02550751990199520002005201020152020Homosexuality never justifiable (WVS) 1990: 88.5% never justifiableHomosexuality never justifiable (WVS) 1995: 69% never justifiableHomosexuality never justifiable (WVS) 2001: 49.5% never justifiableHomosexuality never justifiable (WVS) 2006: 47.8% never justifiableHomosexuality never justifiable (WVS) 2012: 73.1% never justifiableHomosexuality never justifiable (WVS) 2023: 48.1% never justifiable48.1
Data table
Homosexuality never justifiable (WVS)
199088.5
199569
200149.5
200647.8
201273.1
202348.1
Figure 9.15. Over time: Op Sindoor a strong response · % strong
020406020252026Op Sindoor a strong response (MOTN) 2025: 55% strong55
Data table
Op Sindoor a strong response (MOTN)
202555

Measure 2. Identity positions (7 items)

Reading 39.3%

Hindu-only India 12.2, being Hindu key 57, majority will 56.2 … (beliefs_units.csv)

Figure 9.16. Each counted row (% Hindutva share of decided)Rates and shares are not added up: each row is its own reading.
Minorities should adopt majority customs | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202458.2
Being Hindu important to be truly Indian | Pew Religion in India | 2019-2057
Will of majority community should prevail | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202456.2
Special treatment for minorities | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202435.1
Religious diversity benefits India | Pew Religion in India | 2019-2031.2
Govt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202422.3
India belongs only to Hindus | Lokniti-CSDS pre-poll | Apr 202412.2
0100%
Hindutva-alignedOpposed
Data table
% Hindutva share of decidedSide
Minorities should adopt majority customs | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202458.2Hindutva-aligned
Being Hindu important to be truly Indian | Pew Religion in India | 2019-2057Hindutva-aligned
Will of majority community should prevail | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202456.2Hindutva-aligned
Special treatment for minorities | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202435.1Opposed
Religious diversity benefits India | Pew Religion in India | 2019-2031.2Opposed
Govt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202422.3Opposed
India belongs only to Hindus | Lokniti-CSDS pre-poll | Apr 202412.2Opposed
Figure 9.17. Over time: India belongs only to Hindus · % only Hindus
05101520201920202021202220232024India belongs only to Hindus (Lokniti) 2019: 15% only HindusIndia belongs only to Hindus (Lokniti) 2024: 11% only Hindus11
Data table
India belongs only to Hindus (Lokniti)
201915
202411
Figure 9.18. Over time: Minorities should adopt majority customs, Govt must protect minorities even if majority d… · % fully agree
010203040201920202021202220232024Minorities should adopt majority customs (fully agree) 2019: 13% fully agreeMinorities should adopt majority customs (fully agree) 2024: 19.9% fully agreeGovt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes (fully agree) 2019: 37% fully agreeGovt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes (fully agree) 2024: 34% fully agree3419.9
Minorities should adopt majority customs (fully agree)Govt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes (fully agree)
Data table
Minorities should adopt majority customs (fully agree)Govt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes (fully agree)
20191337
202419.934
Figure 9.19. Over time: Minorities should adopt majority customs · % fully disagree
0102030201920202021202220232024Minorities should adopt majority customs (fully disagree) 2019: 27% fully disagreeMinorities should adopt majority customs (fully disagree) 2024: 18% fully disagree18
Data table
Minorities should adopt majority customs (fully disagree)
201927
202418
Figure 9.20. Over time: Vote BJP for Hindutva-aligned · % main reason
0510152020232024Vote BJP for Hindutva-aligned (MOTN, salience) 2023: 14.3% main reason14.3
Data table
Vote BJP for Hindutva-aligned (MOTN, salience)
202314.3

Measure 3. Intensity and salience

Reading 55.5%

Salience items, not support (beliefs_units.csv)

Figure 9.21. Over time: Communal harmony improved under NDA · % improved
020402023202420252026Communal harmony improved under NDA (MOTN) 2023: 41.4% improvedCommunal harmony improved under NDA (MOTN) 2026: 39.6% improved39.6
Data table
Communal harmony improved under NDA (MOTN)
202341.4
202639.6
Figure 9.22. Over time: Communal harmony deteriorated under NDA · % deteriorated
0102030402023202420252026Communal harmony deteriorated under NDA (MOTN) 2023: 34.1% deterioratedCommunal harmony deteriorated under NDA (MOTN) 2024: 28.1% deterioratedCommunal harmony deteriorated under NDA (MOTN) 2026: 29.5% deteriorated29.5
Data table
Communal harmony deteriorated under NDA (MOTN)
202334.1
202428.1
202629.5

Measure 4. Context: shown for reference, not part of the reading

Figure 9.23. Over time: Will of majority community should prevail, Special treatment for minorities needed · % fully agree
0102030201920202021202220232024Will of majority community should prevail (fully agree) 2019: 23% fully agreeWill of majority community should prevail (fully agree) 2024: 18.8% fully agreeSpecial treatment for minorities needed (fully agree) 2019: 27% fully agreeSpecial treatment for minorities needed (fully agree) 2024: 23.9% fully agree23.918.8
Will of majority community should prevail (fully agree)Special treatment for minorities needed (fully agree)
Data table
Will of majority community should prevail (fully agree)Special treatment for minorities needed (fully agree)
20192327
202418.823.9
Figure 9.24. Over time: Strong leader who need not bother about electio… · % agree
0204060201020152020Strong leader who need not bother about elections (agree, NES) 2009: 40% agreeStrong leader who need not bother about elections (agree, NES) 2019: 61% agreeStrong leader who need not bother about elections (agree, NES) 2024: 67.2% agree67.2
Data table
Strong leader who need not bother about elections (agree, NES)
200940
201961
202467.2
Figure 9.25. Over time: Strong leader without parliament/elections good · % very/fairly good
0204060199520002005201020152020Strong leader without parliament/elections good (WVS) 1995: 44.1% very/fairly goodStrong leader without parliament/elections good (WVS) 2001: 42.9% very/fairly goodStrong leader without parliament/elections good (WVS) 2006: 45.6% very/fairly goodStrong leader without parliament/elections good (WVS) 2012: 56.4% very/fairly goodStrong leader without parliament/elections good (WVS) 2023: 62.9% very/fairly good62.9
Data table
Strong leader without parliament/elections good (WVS)
199544.1
200142.9
200645.6
201256.4
202362.9
Figure 9.26. Over time: Ram temple named biggest govt achievement, Ram Mandir most-liked central govt work · % single pick
0102030202120222023202420252026Ram temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience) 2021: 29% single pickRam temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience) 2022: 15.7% single pickRam temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience) 2024: 17% single pickRam temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience) 2025: 15.2% single pickRam temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience) 2026: 11% single pickRam Mandir most-liked central govt work (NES, salience) 2024: 22.4% single pick22.411
Ram temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience)Ram Mandir most-liked central govt work (NES, salience)
Data table
Ram temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience)Ram Mandir most-liked central govt work (NES, salience)
202129
202215.7
20241722.4
202515.2
202611
Figure 9.27. Over time: Satisfied with govt response to Pahalgam · % completely satisfied
020406020252026Satisfied with govt response to Pahalgam (CVoter, completely) 2025: 68.1% completely satisfied68.1
Data table
Satisfied with govt response to Pahalgam (CVoter, completely)
202568.1
Figure 9.28. Over time: Would not like other-religion neighbours · % mentioned
020402005201020152020Would not like other-religion neighbours (WVS) 2001: 40.4% mentionedWould not like other-religion neighbours (WVS) 2006: 44% mentionedWould not like other-religion neighbours (WVS) 2012: 28.4% mentionedWould not like other-religion neighbours (WVS) 2023: 27.6% mentioned27.6
Data table
Would not like other-religion neighbours (WVS)
200140.4
200644
201228.4
202327.6
Figure 9.29. Over time: Religion very important in life · % very important
02040601990199520002005201020152020Religion very important in life (WVS) 1990: 49.2% very importantReligion very important in life (WVS) 1995: 48.2% very importantReligion very important in life (WVS) 2001: 55.8% very importantReligion very important in life (WVS) 2006: 49.7% very importantReligion very important in life (WVS) 2012: 67.1% very importantReligion very important in life (WVS) 2023: 64.2% very important64.2
Data table
Religion very important in life (WVS)
199049.2
199548.2
200155.8
200649.7
201267.1
202364.2

9.6Evidence base

The arena rests on 55 coded units and 72 time-series points. Of the units and flows, 37 are coded Hindutva-aligned, 18 opposed and 0 neutral, mixed or transactional. By source grade: 39 grade B, 14 grade C, 1 grade D, 1 grade E.

The full set of rows for this arena, each with its source, is in the Atlas data file (Appendix D).

Notes

  1. CVoter MOTN; Lokniti; Pew 2021. ↩
  2. UCC, CAA, NRC, Art. 370, love-jihad laws, Op Sindoor, caste census, same-sex marriage, hijab; n recorded for all 9 items; UCC, NRC and love-jihad are support-only (no oppose figure published) (beliefs_units.csv). ↩
  3. Hindu-only India 12.2, being Hindu key 57, majority will 56.2 … (beliefs_units.csv). ↩
  4. Salience items, not support (beliefs_units.csv). ↩