The arena is measured by 16 representative survey items on policy (UCC, CAA, Art. 370, conversion laws, security …) and identity (Hindu India, majority will …), weighted by sample and recency, plus salience.
9.2Significance
What a party can say and do without losing votes; public acceptance of laws; a slow-moving layer of power.
9.3Indicators and weights
Table 9.1 lists the 3 indicators of the arena, the weight of each within the arena, and each indicator’s reading (the Hindutva-aligned share, from 0 to 100).
Table 9.1. Indicators of arena 2.2
Indicator
Weight
Reading
Policy positions (9 all-adult items, sample- and recency-weighted)2
The arena reads 50.7, 0.7 points above parity, and is classified as contested (a reading from 45 to below 60). With a weight of 3 of a total 107.7, it contributes 1.41 points to the composite reading of 45.7.
The indicators diverge: the highest reading is for policy positions (9 all-adult items, sample- and recency-weighted) (59.8), the lowest for identity positions (7 items) (39.3).
Figure 9.1. Readings of arena 2.2 by indicator
050100
Policy positions (9 all-adult items, sample- and recency-weighted)59.8
Identity positions (7 items)39.3
Intensity and salience55.5
Arena reading50.7
Hindutva-alignedOpposed
Each bar divides the indicator between Hindutva-aligned (left) and opposed (right) holdings. The vertical rule marks parity.
9.5Measures and exhibits
The exhibits below are the Atlas’s own views of the data behind each measure: shares by side, the largest units, breakdowns by source, recipient and country, money-flow diagrams and time series. Full row-level ledgers are in the data file (Appendix D).
Measure 1. Policy positions (9 all-adult items, sample- and recency-weighted)
Reading 59.8%
UCC, CAA, NRC, Art. 370, love-jihad laws, Op Sindoor, caste census, same-sex marriage, hijab; n recorded for all 9 items; UCC, NRC and love-jihad are support-only (no oppose figure published) (beliefs_units.csv)
Figure 9.2. Each counted row (% Hindutva share of decided)Rates and shares are not added up: each row is its own reading.
Uniform Civil Code | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Aug 202675
Operation Sindoor / strong security | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Aug 202572.4
Hijab ban in schools | India Today-CVoter MOTN | Jan 202368.7
Anti-conversion / "love jihad" laws | India Today-Karvy MOTN | Jan 2021
58
Hindutva-aligned
NRC | India Today-Karvy MOTN | Jan 2020
49
Opposed
Same-sex marriage | Pew Global Attitudes (Spring 2023) | Feb-May 2023
44.8
Opposed
Caste census | DALES Indian Election Study 2024 | Apr-Jun 2024
23.5
Opposed
Figure 9.3. Over time: UCC support, CAA support · % support
UCC support (India Today MOTN)CAA support
Data table
UCC support (India Today MOTN)
CAA support
2019
62.1
2021
70
2023
69
2025
65.1
2026
73.9
Figure 9.4. Over time: CAA support · % "helps persecuted minorities"Data table
CAA support
2020
41
Figure 9.5. Over time: CAA support · % approveData table
CAA support
2021
53
Figure 9.6. Over time: NRC support · % implement nationwideData table
NRC support
2019
65.4
Figure 9.7. Over time: NRC support · % "good step"Data table
NRC support
2020
49
Figure 9.8. Over time: Art 370 (should be revoked/repealed) · % should be revokedData table
Art 370: should be revoked/repealed
2019
57
Figure 9.9. Over time: Art 370 (should be revoked/repealed) · % should have been repealedData table
Art 370: should be revoked/repealed
2024
34
Figure 9.10. Over time: Art 370 (want it reinstated) · % want Art 370 reinstatedData table
Art 370: want it reinstated
2023
31.2
Figure 9.11. Over time: Caste census support · % in favourData table
Caste census support (MOTN; Hindutva coded oppose)
2024
59
2025
69
Figure 9.12. Over time: Same-sex marriage support/acceptance · % acceptedData table
Same-sex marriage support/acceptance
2019
24
Figure 9.13. Over time: Same-sex marriage support/acceptance · % favour legal SSMData table
Same-sex marriage support/acceptance
2023
53
Figure 9.14. Over time: Homosexuality never justifiable · % never justifiableData table
Homosexuality never justifiable (WVS)
1990
88.5
1995
69
2001
49.5
2006
47.8
2012
73.1
2023
48.1
Figure 9.15. Over time: Op Sindoor a strong response · % strongData table
Op Sindoor a strong response (MOTN)
2025
55
Measure 2. Identity positions (7 items)
Reading 39.3%
Hindu-only India 12.2, being Hindu key 57, majority will 56.2 … (beliefs_units.csv)
Figure 9.16. Each counted row (% Hindutva share of decided)Rates and shares are not added up: each row is its own reading.
Minorities should adopt majority customs | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202458.2
Being Hindu important to be truly Indian | Pew Religion in India | 2019-2057
Will of majority community should prevail | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202456.2
Special treatment for minorities | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202435.1
Religious diversity benefits India | Pew Religion in India | 2019-2031.2
Govt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 202422.3
India belongs only to Hindus | Lokniti-CSDS pre-poll | Apr 202412.2
0100%
Hindutva-alignedOpposed
Data table
% Hindutva share of decided
Side
Minorities should adopt majority customs | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 2024
58.2
Hindutva-aligned
Being Hindu important to be truly Indian | Pew Religion in India | 2019-20
57
Hindutva-aligned
Will of majority community should prevail | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 2024
56.2
Hindutva-aligned
Special treatment for minorities | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 2024
35.1
Opposed
Religious diversity benefits India | Pew Religion in India | 2019-20
31.2
Opposed
Govt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes | Lokniti-CSDS NES post-poll | Jun 2024
22.3
Opposed
India belongs only to Hindus | Lokniti-CSDS pre-poll | Apr 2024
12.2
Opposed
Figure 9.17. Over time: India belongs only to Hindus · % only HindusData table
India belongs only to Hindus (Lokniti)
2019
15
2024
11
Figure 9.18. Over time: Minorities should adopt majority customs, Govt must protect minorities even if majority d… · % fully agree
Minorities should adopt majority customs (fully agree)Govt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes (fully agree)
Data table
Minorities should adopt majority customs (fully agree)
Govt must protect minorities even if majority dislikes (fully agree)
2019
13
37
2024
19.9
34
Figure 9.19. Over time: Minorities should adopt majority customs · % fully disagreeData table
Minorities should adopt majority customs (fully disagree)
2019
27
2024
18
Figure 9.20. Over time: Vote BJP for Hindutva-aligned · % main reasonData table
Vote BJP for Hindutva-aligned (MOTN, salience)
2023
14.3
Measure 3. Intensity and salience
Reading 55.5%
Salience items, not support (beliefs_units.csv)
Figure 9.21. Over time: Communal harmony improved under NDA · % improvedData table
Communal harmony improved under NDA (MOTN)
2023
41.4
2026
39.6
Figure 9.22. Over time: Communal harmony deteriorated under NDA · % deterioratedData table
Communal harmony deteriorated under NDA (MOTN)
2023
34.1
2024
28.1
2026
29.5
Measure 4. Context: shown for reference, not part of the reading
Figure 9.23. Over time: Will of majority community should prevail, Special treatment for minorities needed · % fully agree
Will of majority community should prevail (fully agree)Special treatment for minorities needed (fully agree)
Data table
Will of majority community should prevail (fully agree)
Special treatment for minorities needed (fully agree)
2019
23
27
2024
18.8
23.9
Figure 9.24. Over time: Strong leader who need not bother about electio… · % agreeData table
Strong leader who need not bother about elections (agree, NES)
2009
40
2019
61
2024
67.2
Figure 9.25. Over time: Strong leader without parliament/elections good · % very/fairly goodData table
Strong leader without parliament/elections good (WVS)
1995
44.1
2001
42.9
2006
45.6
2012
56.4
2023
62.9
Figure 9.26. Over time: Ram temple named biggest govt achievement, Ram Mandir most-liked central govt work · % single pick
Ram temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience)Ram Mandir most-liked central govt work (NES, salience)
Data table
Ram temple named biggest govt achievement (MOTN, salience)
Ram Mandir most-liked central govt work (NES, salience)
2021
29
2022
15.7
2024
17
22.4
2025
15.2
2026
11
Figure 9.27. Over time: Satisfied with govt response to Pahalgam · % completely satisfiedData table
Satisfied with govt response to Pahalgam (CVoter, completely)
2025
68.1
Figure 9.28. Over time: Would not like other-religion neighbours · % mentionedData table
Would not like other-religion neighbours (WVS)
2001
40.4
2006
44
2012
28.4
2023
27.6
Figure 9.29. Over time: Religion very important in life · % very importantData table
Religion very important in life (WVS)
1990
49.2
1995
48.2
2001
55.8
2006
49.7
2012
67.1
2023
64.2
9.6Evidence base
The arena rests on 55 coded units and 72 time-series points. Of the units and flows, 37 are coded Hindutva-aligned, 18 opposed and 0 neutral, mixed or transactional. By source grade: 39 grade B, 14 grade C, 1 grade D, 1 grade E.
The full set of rows for this arena, each with its source, is in the Atlas data file (Appendix D).
UCC, CAA, NRC, Art. 370, love-jihad laws, Op Sindoor, caste census, same-sex marriage, hijab; n recorded for all 9 items; UCC, NRC and love-jihad are support-only (no oppose figure published) (beliefs_units.csv). ↩
Hindu-only India 12.2, being Hindu key 57, majority will 56.2 … (beliefs_units.csv). ↩
Salience items, not support (beliefs_units.csv). ↩